Везде

RAS BiologyРастительные ресурсы Vegetation Resources

  • ISSN (Print) 0033-9946
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5723

Features of the introduced species composition and state in the arboreta of Dzhanybek research station in the Northern Pre-Caspian Semi-Desert

You can
PII
10.31857/S0033994624010059-1
DOI
10.31857/S0033994624010059
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
M. L. Sizemskaya
  • Affiliation: Institute of Forest Science, RAS
Volume/ Edition
Volume 60 / Issue number 1
Pages
80-93
Abstract
The results of studying introduced species diversity and state under rainfed conditions at the Research station of the Institute of Forest Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences have been presented. The station is located in the clay semi-desert of the Northern Pre-Caspian region between the Volga and Ural rivers. The collections of two arboreta were examined. The first arboretum was established in 1953 on hydromorphic meadow-chestnut soils of large mesodepressions, and the second – in 1974 on solonetzic automorphic soils. The arboreta were originally established with an idea of complete elimination of irrigation. In recent decades, tending and silvicultural treatments were discontinued for a number of reasons. An annotated list of tree and shrub species includes 77 species belonging to 25 families and 44 genus. In the arboretum on the large mesodepression, the number of species surviving for more than half a century is 35% in relation to the number of “core” introduced species. Mostly, the species are represented by the families Rosaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Elaeagnaceae, Fagaceae, Fabacea, Oleaceae, Salicaceae, Sapindaceae, Ulmaceae. Some specimens older than 70 years are in satisfactory condition and produce viable volunteer regrowth. The main stages of their acclimatization, in relation to age, and changes in growing conditions, as affected by plants themselves as well as climate, are distinguished. In arboretum on solonetzic soils, the survival of species is 50%. The composition of tree and shrub vegetation of an unused pond, where spontaneous vegetation formed an intrazonal willow-oleaster-poplar community of quasi-riparian type, and of the overgrowing fallow land, where a specific “savannah-like” landscape was formed, have been studied. This allowed to identify the species whose life strategy contributes to their successful colonization of human-disturbed habitats and, in some cases, manifestation of the features of naturalization and invasiveness. The most promising species for landscaping, parks and other plantings in such harsh natural and climatic conditions were also determined.
Keywords
интродуценты дендрарий видовой состав состояние
Date of publication
15.01.2024
Year of publication
2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
51

References

  1. 1. Семенютина А.В. 2013. Дендрофлора лесомелиоративных комплексов. Волгоград. 266 с. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28414299
  2. 2. Brand D., Moshe I., Shachak M. 2015. Functional Rehabilitation of Desertified Ecosystems in Israel: Ecological and Socioecological Perspectives. – In: Living Land. UNCCD. P. 88–92. https://catalogue.unccd.int/562_Living_Land_ENG.pdf
  3. 3. Vlasenko A. 2015. Analysis of ex situ cultivation of Ukrainian rare steppe dendroflora. – Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University. 5(1): 24–47. https://www.ujecology.com/articles/analysis-of-ex-situ-cultivation-of-ukrainian-rare-steppe-dendroflora.pdf (на украинском)
  4. 4. Sun R., Tian T. 2016. Houston Arboretum & Nature Center, Texas. – Landsc. Archit. Front. 4(3): 86–99. https://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/Y2016/V4/I3/86
  5. 5. Boiko T.O., Dementieva O.I. 2018. The tree vegetation of the Kherson State Agrarian University Arboretum. – Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 8(2): 120–127. https://www.ujecology.com/articles/the-tree-vegetation-of-the-kherson-state-agrarian-university-arboretum.pdf (на украинском)
  6. 6. Burda R.I., Koniakin S.N. 2019. The non-native woody species of the flora of Ukraine: Introduction, naturalization and invasion. – Biosyst. Divers. 27(3): 276–290. https://doi.org/10.15421/011937
  7. 7. Биогеоценотические основы освоения полупустыни Северного Прикаспия. 1974. М. 360 с.
  8. 8. Карандина С.Н., Эрперт С.Д. 1972. Климатическое испытание древесных пород в Прикаспийской полупустыне. М. 127 с.
  9. 9. Сенкевич Н.Г., Оловянникова И.Н. 1996. Интродукция древесных растений в полупустыне Северного Прикаспия. М. 184 с.
  10. 10. The Plant list. Version 1.1. September 2013. WFO (2023): The World Flora Online. https://www.worldfloraonline.org/
  11. 11. Семенютина А.В., Терешкин А.В. 2016. Защитные лесные насаждения: анализ видового состава и научные основы повышения биоразнообразия дендрофлоры. – Успехи совр. естеств. 4: 99–104. https://natural-sciences.ru/ru/article/view?id=35870
  12. 12. Семенютина А.В., Долгих А.А., Панов В.И., Зеленяк А.К. 2016. Интродукция как способ повышения биоразнообразия и обогащения дендрофлоры аридных территорий. – Социально-экологические технологии. 3: 47–54. http://soc-ecol.ru/introduktsiya-kak-sposob-povysheniya-bioraznoobraziya-i-obogashheniya-dendroflory-aridnyh-territorij/
  13. 13. Яценко И.О., Виноградова Ю.К. 2018. Инвазионная активность древесных растений в Главном ботаническом саду им. Н.В. Цицина Российской академии наук. – Российский журнал биологических инвазий. 4: 117–131. http://www.sevin.ru/invasjour/issues/2018_4/Yatsenko_18_4.pdf
  14. 14. Сиземская М.Л., Копыл И.В., Сапанов М.К. 1995. Заселение древесно-кустарниковой растительностью искусственных понижений мезорельефа в полупустыне Прикаспия. – Лесоведение. 1: 15–23. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21267005
  15. 15. Сиземская М.Л., Елекешева М.М., Сапанов М.К. 2020. Формирование лесных биогеоценозов на нарушенных землях Северного Прикаспия. – Поволж. экол. журн. 1: 86–98. https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2020-1-86-98
  16. 16. Березуцкий М.А., Завьялов Е.В., Мосолова Е.Ю., Табачишин В.Г., Якушев Н.Н. 2008. О натурализации и некоторых биотических связях лоха остроплодного (Elaeagnus oxycarpa Schlecht.) на территории Саратовской области. – Бюлл. бот. сада Саратовского госуд. универ. 7: 52–59. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28781130
  17. 17. Zhang X., Li G., Du S. 2018. Simulating the Potential Distribution of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. Based on Climatic Constraints in China. – Ecol. Eng. 113: 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.01.009
  18. 18. Сапанов М.К., Сиземская М.Л. 2021. Экологические особенности возобновления клена ясенелистного в аридных регионах России. – Лесоведение. 3: 325–334. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0024114821030098
  19. 19. Сапанов М.К. 2003. Экология лесных насаждений в аридных регионах. Тула. 248 с.
  20. 20. Сапанов М.К. 2010. Влияние изменения климата на обводненность Северного Прикаспия. – Аридные экосистемы. 16 (5): 25–30. 16(5): 25–30. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15487267
  21. 21. Сапанов М.К. 2018. Экологические последствия потепления климата в Северном Прикапии. – Аридные экосистемы. 24(1): 21–33. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32570974
  22. 22. Виноградова Ю.К., Майоров С.Р., Хорун Л.В. 2010. Черная книга флоры Средней России: Чужеродные виды растений в экосистемах Средней России. М. 503 с. https://www.rfbr.ru/rffi/ru/books/o_26717
  23. 23. Nentwig W., Bacher S., Kumschick S., Pyšek P., Vilà M. 2018. More than “100 worst” alien species in Europe. – Biol. Invasions. 20(6): 1611–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1651-6
  24. 24. van Kleunen M., Dawson W., Essl F., Pergl J., Winter M., Weber E., et al. 2015. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. – Nature. 525(7567): 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14910
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library