RAS BiologyРастительные ресурсы Vegetation Resources

  • ISSN (Print) 0033-9946
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5723

Pollen Morphology of Some Melliferous Rosaceae Species of the Leningrad Region

PII
10.31857/S0033994623040106-1
DOI
10.31857/S0033994623040106
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 59 / Issue number 4
Pages
412-423
Abstract
Abstract—Using light and scanning electron microscopes, the pollen morphology of 11 wild and introduced melliferous species widely distributed in the Leningrad Region and belonging to 9 genera of the Rosaceae family was studied. It was found that pollen grains of all the studied species are of medium size, 25–40 microns, occasionally slightly smaller, most of them are 3-furrowed, in Sanguisorba officinalis L. 6-furrowed, with a striate or derived from it sculpture. In the dispersed state, pollen is easily determined to the family, and often to the genus. However, species of Rosa and Rubus are poorly distinguished by pollen. The data obtained can help honey producers to simplify the botanical identification of Rosaceae pollen in tested honey samples.
Keywords
Rosaceae медоносные растения пыльцевые зерна палиноморфология Ленинградская область
Date of publication
01.10.2023
Year of publication
2023
Number of purchasers
0
Views
50

References

  1. 1. Иллюстрированный определитель растений Ленинградской области. 2006. М. 799с.
  2. 2. ГОСТ РФ 19792-2017 “Мед натуральный. Технические условия”. 17 с.
  3. 3. Reitsma Tj. 1966. Pollen morphology of some European Rosaceae. – Acta Bot. Neerl. 15(2): 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1966.tb00234.x
  4. 4. Eide F. 1981. Key of Northwest European Rosaceae pollen. – Grana. 20: 101–118.
  5. 5. Hebda R.J., Chinnappa C.C. 1990. Studies on pollen morphology of Rosaceae in Canada. – Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 64: 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-6667 (90)90123-Z
  6. 6. Byatt J.I. 1976. Pollen morphology of some European species of Crataegus L. and of Mespilus germanica L. (Rosaceae). – Pollen et Spores. 18: 335–349.
  7. 7. Федорнчук Н.М., Савицкий В.Д. 1985. Палиноморфологическое изучение украинских видов рода Crataegus (Rosaceae). – Бот. журн. 70(9): 1190–1196. http://arch.botjournal.ru/?t=issues&id=19850909&rid=pdf_0005214
  8. 8. Dönmez E.O. 2008. Pollen morphology in Turkish Crataegus (Rosaceae). – Bot. Helv. 118(1): 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-008-0823-5
  9. 9. Wrońska-Pilarek D., Bocianowski J., Jagodziński A.M. 2013. Comparison of pollen grain morphological features of selected species of the genus Crataegus (Rosaceae) and their spontaneous hybrids. – Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 172(4): 555–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12033
  10. 10. Hebda R.J., Chinnappa C.C. 1990. Pollen morphology of the Rosaceae of western Canada. III. Geum. – Canad. J. Bot. 68(6): 5–55. https://doi.org/10.1139/b90-175
  11. 11. Sánchez Agudo J.A., Rico E., Sánchez Sánchez J. 1998. Palynological study of Potentilla subgen. Potentilla (Rosaceae) in the Western Mediterranean. – Grana. 37(5): 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173139809362679
  12. 12. Wrońska-Pilarek D. 2011. Pollen morphology of Polish native species of the Rosa genus (Rosaceae) and its relation to systematics. – Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 80(3): 221–232. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2011.031
  13. 13. Wrońska-Pilarek D., Jagodziński A.M. 2011. Systematic importance of pollen morphological features of selected species from the genus Rosa (Rosaceae). – Plant Syst. Evol. 295(1): 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0462-y
  14. 14. Григорьева В.В., Капелян А.И., Гаврилова О.А., Брицкий Д.А., Ткаченко К.Г. 2022. Морфология пыльцевых зерен некоторых видов Rosa (Rosaceae) из коллекции Ботанического сада Петра Великого. – Бот. журн. 107(12): 1200–1215. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49937814
  15. 15. Lechowicz K., Bocianowski J., Wrońska-Pilarek D. 2021. Pollen morphology and variability of species from the genus Rubus L. (Rosaceae) alien and invasive in Poland. – Webbia. 76(1): 109–121. https://doi.org/10.36253/jopt-10355
  16. 16. Chung K.S., Elisens W.J., Skvarla J.J. 2010. Pollen morphology and its phylogenetic significance in tribe Sanguisorbeae (Rosaceae). – Plant Syst. Evol. 285(3–4): 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0262-9
  17. 17. Qiu Z., Zhao Y., Qian Y., Tan C., Tang C., Chen X. 2023. Seed and pollen morphology in nine native Chinese species of Sorbus (Rosaceae). – Int. J. Fruit Sci. 23(1): 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2023.2212057
  18. 18. Полякова Т.А., Гатаулина Г.Н. 2008. Морфология и изменчивость пыльцы рода Spiraea L. (Rоsaceae) Сибири и Дальнего Востока. – Сибирский экологический журн. 15(4): 545–551. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11515839
  19. 19. Wrońska-Pilarek D., Sowelo M., Antkowiak W., Bocianowski J., Lechowicz K. 2022. Pollen morphology and variability of native and alien, including invasive, species of the genus Spiraea L. (Rosaceae) in Poland. – PLoS One. 17(8): e0273743 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273743
  20. 20. Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen morphology and taxonomy. Angiosperms. Stockholm. 539 p.
  21. 21. Куприянова Л.А., Алешина Л.А. 1967. Палинологическая терминология покрытосеменных растений. Л. 84 с.
  22. 22. Куприянова Л.А., Алешина Л.А. 1972. Пыльца и споры растений флоры европейской части СССР. Т. 1. Л. С. 48–51.
  23. 23. Куприянова Л.А., Алешина Л.А. 1978. Пыльца двудольных растений флоры европейской части СССР. Т. 2. Л. 184 с.
  24. 24. Lee S., Heo K., Cho J., Lee C., Chen W., Kim S.C. 2011. New insights into pollen morphology and its implications in the phylogeny of Sanguisorba L. (Rosaceae; Sanguisorbeae). – Plant Syst. Evol. 291(3–4): 227–242.
  25. 25. Pozhidaev A.E. 1993. Polymorphism of pollen in the genus Acer (Aceraceae). Isomorphism of deviate forms of Angiosperm pollen. – Grana. 32(2): 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173139309429457
  26. 26. Pozhidaev A.E. 1995. Pollen morphology of the genus Aesculus (Hippocastanaceae). Patterns in the variety of morphological characteristics. – Grana. 34(1): 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173139509429028
  27. 27. Pozhidaev A.E. 1998. Hypothetical way of pollen aperture patterning. 1. Formation of 3-colpate patterns and endoaperture geometry. – Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 104(1): 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-6667 (98)00045-1
  28. 28. Дзюба О.Ф. 2006. Палиноиндикация качества окружающей среды. СПб. 197 с.
  29. 29. Шелудякова М.Б., Григорьева В.В., Пожидаев А.Е. 2017. Морфология пыльцевых зерен представителей рода Scrophularia (Scrophulariaceae). – Бот. журн. 102(3): 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006813617030061
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library